1) Can diversity save species?
i
definitely think diversity can be the best chance at saving species. When anything is just "black and white" it will have a hard time surviving. Weather
that's a species, an opinion, or just about anything else you can think of. Options are always good in life. The reason nature creates so many variables is a way of
development and/or survival. No two things are alike in the natural world and when man forces his will upon something to narrow its diversification the chance of survival greatly decreases. Maybe it be thought of that diversification in nature is a way of trial and error. Some traits work in a specific environment and others
don't. But to know which will be the most successful nature tests them out. But i also feel its important to say that there is also an element of time in the mix. One variable will work great in a specific environment in a specific time, but in another time in the same environment that same trait may not be as successful. So, in order for survival rates to stay up there needs to be as many variables as possible to with stand the change in environment and time.
2) Do you vote for the chicken or the egg?
Hmmm, what if i said i am not a registered voter on this life long debate. Ill let the world duke this one out while i make an
omelet. Or maybe I'll make a plate of chicken
Marsala.
Hmmm, so hard to decide...
lol3)"i always eat my broccoli"
It seems we all know that
veggies are great for us. I
don't think there is a person in the modern world who
doesn't know that fact or who disputes the claims. But some people still
don't eat them. So This research is great for those who eat veggies and need a pat on the back, and in the other corner i highly doubt the research will get non-veggie eaters to put the cheese burger and fries down for a tasty plate of fresh vegetables. To each their own....