1)i think that the platform offers a level of universal awareness that is seldom understood these days. Many of the points are inherent truths that we as humans have forgotten over the past few hundred years. Although, the 8th point seems a bit suspicious to me. Subscribing to the other points doesn't need to create any obligation. Embodying the points and receiving the benefit from them naturally is enough. There is no need to be an activist or preacher about it. Preachers and activists are funny people in my opinion. They all have a point of view and have something to prove. But universal understanding will always thrive. No need for the fight. Things will eventually balance out. They always have and always will...I'm sure this statement pisses people off but if one doesn't put up targets then there is nothing for them to punch. I'm glad there are activists in this world but ill never be one. That's just not my role here. So to say that if i agree with the "eight-point plan" means i need to take action against those who dont understand it (even in a passive way) than that war is something don't care to mingle with. If i invite politics into my sphere they fight inside me. You can all have that fight, ill just go on doing what it do quietly...
2) Ecosystems are like a spiders web; strong enough to support the spider and strong enough to catch prey, but so fragile even a mild gust of wind (external force) can destroy it.. But that is nothing to worry about because the spider will build another place to live the very next day. Life moves on, fragile and strong.
3) I think the end goals of social ecology are very interesting and informative. We are a social species and to not take social measurements into account when analyzing the successes and failures of the human race would but missing the big picture of how, why, where, when, and with who we do the things we do. I'm not sure a complete picture can be drawn though in our time. Looking back we can draw a complete picture but there are many things missed when looking in the present with a method that judges the past.